Tags
B2B Marketing, Customer experience, Customer relationship management, Customer support, Sales operations
Feeling punchy? Try this. Next time you’re in a common area at your office – break room, cafeteria, line for the copier - turn to the person closest to you and ask, “Who at our company do you think owns the customer?” And make sure at least one other person in the vicinity is paying attention to the response. Best case: vigorous debate. Worst case: flying staplers.
Fact is, nearly every function in most companies touches the customer at one point or another. Sales, Marketing, Finance, R&D, Product Management, Customer Service… They all cross paths with Joe Customer. And several of these functions have either concluded on their own or have been told that they “own” the customer.
Nobody single-handedly owns the customer. Everybody collectively owns the customer. The critical question therefore becomes, how can your company orchestrate the actions of all these functions so they add up to happy customers that keep buying from you? The first place to start is one of the four fundamental building blocks of any operation: organizational design. And yes, the CMO needs to be right in the thick of it.
As the top-line goes, so goes the fate of the CMO at many companies. And in the B2B world, if you’re not consistently selling to your existing customers, chances are your top-line is trending unfavorably or will be soon. Therefore, to fairly hold CMOs in some proportion responsible for installed-base demand and revenue creation, CEOs must also grant CMOs the means to influence customer experience in the same proportion. As the CMO, if this means of influence doesn’t exist, you must create it.
Voice of Customer
As with all efforts to increase his/her operational relevance, the CMO must come to the customer management operational war room armed with good data - customer satisfaction data, to be precise. Most companies have measured customer satisfaction at some point in their histories, although many don’t do it consistently and many more don’t have a standardized approach to responding to the findings.
There are countless tools and techniques to measure customer satisfaction and loyalty. Research and articles abound on the pros and cons of old-school and new-school methods. I would suggest that you find and study any customer satisfaction data that already exists in your company. If nothing current exists, start with a simple survey of no more than a dozen or so questions that cover every functional area in your company with which your typical customer interacts.
Whether you’re studying existing data or collecting new, it’s critical that you look for correlations between functional and overall satisfaction levels. In other words, try to draw conclusions regarding which functional areas have the most direct impact on overall satisfaction. If you have enough data, you might also be able to correlate favorable customer satisfaction ratings with higher revenue contribution. On a macro-level, these revenue correlations already exist for widely used methods like Net Promoter Score (Figure 1).
One Team. One Purpose.
If you can, use your customer satisfaction data analysis to demonstrate to fellow executives that installed-base revenues are directly proportional to customer satisfaction levels, and that the degrees to which your company’s customer-facing functions impact customer satisfaction levels are measurable and actionable.
While it is indeed true that many functions interact with the customer, many of these interactions constitute means to an end. That end is increasing the revenue coming from each customer. It’s the job of Finance to bill customers accurately and efficiently so they are satisfied enough to maintain or increase their investment in your company’s offerings. It’s the job of Customer Service to respond accurately and efficiently to inquiry calls so customers are satisfied enough to maintain or increase their investment in your company’s offerings. It’s the job of R&D… well, you get the picture.
And the only way to ensure that the net effect of all these efforts is to push customer satisfaction levels ever skyward, thereby paving the way for additional sales is to put the staplers down and establish a cross-functional team that “owns” responsibility for customer retention and growth.
There’s no formula for getting this done, but shoot for these milestones:
- Use credible customer satisfaction data to establish consensus at the executive level that multiple company functions impact customer satisfaction and customer revenue performance.
- Expose instances of when the experiences of high-value customers have suffered due to overlapping or conflicting activities undertaken by multiple functional groups in your company.
- Gain executive backing for the theoretical merit of a cross-functional “customer management team” as a means to align all client-facing activities according to customer satisfaction and revenue targets.
- Propose such a cross-functional team, chaired by the CMO due to direct revenue implications.
- Pick a delegate or two from every function that touches the customer to join a 6- to 12-month pilot of the customer management team.
- Track the team’s impact on a select few leading indicators of customer satisfaction and installed-base revenue improvements (more on customer KPI management in upcoming posts).
- Report pilot results to executive team and gain backing for a permanent customer management team.

I could not agree more. Relationships are key to a positive customer experience. For this… we are all responsible.
Amen, sister!
Great opener, Mark! As dicey as it might feel to ask the question, avoiding this question is far more risky than asking it. I laugh when I think of our human organisms functioning with similar silos… Imagine the eye saying, “I’m in charge of engagement,” and then failing to alert the hand to opportunities to shake and exchange business cards? The cross-functional team and role clarification you suggest will avoid redundancies AND undoubtedly enhance service and sales. I’m curious to hear what others are seeing. Who owns the customer at your org? And who should be responsible for oversight of customer service?
Thanks Mary. Very enlightening to think of how dysfunctional our own bodies would be without cross-functional alignment! I echo Mary’s closing questions… How is this thorny issue of customer ownership playing out at your companies?
I am a strong believer that you need to take this even a step further. For any organization to be truly successful as a marketing organization, marketing has to be a philosophy and not data, numbers or a set of actions we do specifically to satisfy an outcome.
Yes, everyone in the organization “owns” the customer, but we are again focusing on the external customer. For an organization to be truly successful, you have to look within as well and realize that we are all “customers” of one and another, inter-departmental, external, etc. Until we realize this and have our employees treat each other in a fashion of “how can I help with your needs” will an organization transform. This is what I mean by statement that marketing should be a philosophy.
As executives in an organization, you can speak about how we shoud treat our “customers” when we refer to the external customers, but if within the organization we don’t treat our internal customers in a similar fashion, it is only lipstick on a pig.
I agree with your statement that we collectively all own the customer, but the customer is more than the external paying person.
Great points, Henk. Thanks for your insights. Yes, we can’t forget how vital it is for executive managers to instill this sense of inter-departmental accountability within their companies. Just think how often we still hear that selling internally is MUCH harder than selling externally, due to the fiefdoms, personal agendas, and egos that obstruct progress. Do you have any examples of practical methods executives can use to foster this marketing “philosophy” within their organizations?
In my experience and how I personally approach this is through coaching with everyone in the organization. Share your experiences, but let people make decisions. Over the years, I have always asked people when they have a question, what they would do or think. Just because I am in a certain position doesn’t mean that my answer is gospel. By leading co-workers through this process you understand they way of thinking and problem solving. If the end result is in line with your company goals, let them do it their way. Coach the process, not the end result.
It is a simple fact that their is no single way/process for success, otherwise we all would do exactly the same thing. By empowering co-workers to come up with their own solutions that support the overall company mission and goal, you get co-workers who are more marketing driven. I made the assumption here that part of the company’s mission is to be market driven organization.
This is one way to create more accountability in an organization. You will find people in any organization that want to be led and don’t want to make decisions. Those you need to show that even if mistakes are being made, you move forward. To this date, I still ask people when something went wrong “Did anyone die?” if not, we can fix the error, learn from it and move forward. Don’t make the same mistake twice, but when you work and make decisions, inherently sometimes you could have made a better decision. Fix it, move on. People who don’t make any decisions are worse for an organization as they are not challenging their teams.
More great insights, Henk. Thanks. Takes a great deal of wisdom and humility to put all of this into practice. I’d welcome your comments on future posts!
Great post Mark! This is extremely relevant for high tech companies which tend to be very engineering centric and do not understand the importance of orchestrating internal operations to align with customer needs.
Thanks cramaswamy. Very true indeed. First step for CMOs in this situation is to establish credibility with engineering counterparts so they can begin to change the way decisions are made and priorities are set in product development.
Pingback: One Size Does NOT Fit All in Customer Management « Shotgun!
Pingback: Walking the Talk in Customer Management « Shotgun!
Pingback: Banking on Revenue from Customers? Map Your Processes. « Shotgun!
Pingback: How to Build a Customer Management Dashboard « Shotgun!